Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi

Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi tarafından doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak yayınlanan; kitap, makale, tez, bildiri, rapor gibi tüm akademik kaynakları uluslararası standartlarda dijital ortamda depolar, Üniversitenin akademik performansını izlemeye aracılık eder, kaynakları uzun süreli saklar ve yayınların etkisini artırmak için telif haklarına uygun olarak Açık Erişime sunar.

MSGSÜ'de Ara
Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGönül, Hale
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T19:59:47Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T19:59:47Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2146-9229
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1014603
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/529880
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14124/7339
dc.description.abstractNew building projects have increasingly been offering publicly accessed outdoor spaces, transforming the interfaces between the building and the city into soft edges. This approach is especially evident in the latest projects in Copenhagen. This design apprehension is considered to be in relation to the increasing emphasis on public space, changing roles of private and public entities in the production and maintenance of space, the urban policies of Copenhagen as well as the inclusive approach of the designers. The study aims to evaluate this new kind of architectural design approach where the boundaries between the city and the building blur and the edge turns into a public space serving to a wider public. The study examines five projects from Copenhagen (BLOX/DAC, Maersk Tower, Axel Towers, CopenHill and Red Cross Volunteer House), based on the criteria derived from the urban policies of Copenhagen (that owes significantly to Jan Gehl) targeted towards 2025 to analyze the spatial configuration of the edges as well as the success of the public spaces introduced within the projects. The results of the analyses demonstrate different patterns of publicness in different projects as well as in different parts of the same project. Nonetheless, the projects in question can be considered as successful soft edges offering vivid urban life by blurring the boundaries between the building and the city.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKent Akademisi (Online)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitecture of Copenhagenen_US
dc.subjectJahn Gehlen_US
dc.subjectPublic Spaceen_US
dc.subjectSoft edgeen_US
dc.subjectUrban Spaceen_US
dc.titleThe Building Edge as Public Space: Discussing the Contemporary Design Approach with Five Projects from Copenhagenen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.35674/kent.1014603
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage798en_US
dc.identifier.endpage818en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid529880
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.snmzKA_20250105


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster