Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi

Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi tarafından doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak yayınlanan; kitap, makale, tez, bildiri, rapor gibi tüm akademik kaynakları uluslararası standartlarda dijital ortamda depolar, Üniversitenin akademik performansını izlemeye aracılık eder, kaynakları uzun süreli saklar ve yayınların etkisini artırmak için telif haklarına uygun olarak Açık Erişime sunar.

MSGSÜ'de Ara
Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Burcu Selcen
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T20:08:02Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T20:08:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1300-5707
dc.identifier.issn2636-8064
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29135/std.507263
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14124/7946
dc.description.abstractMonumental historic buildings arc a small portion of Turkey's built heritage and deserve to be protected with care. However, when examined through a chronological view starting from 1923, it is observed that the conservation activities in Turkey have often failed to succeed in preserving their authentic features. One of the fundamental problems lies in the fact that there is discordance between state institutions responsible of the decision making process for cultural heritage and the ones responsible of controlling the practice on site. This article aims to investigate the reasons of this discordance and while doing this, it first sheds a light on the development of architectural conservation in the republican period briefly, focuses on the different shifts and tendencies in time and highlight the events and institutions which have been influential in triggering these changes. The limited conservation activities in the founding years of the republic took a rise in 1930s with the first national listing and documentation studies and in 1950s after the establishment of the High Council for the Protection of Historical Monuments the legislation became the primary step in conservation. While the urban development projects had a destructive impact on Istanbul's historic fabric in late 1950's, many monuments were restored for the celebrations of 500th year of the conquest of the city. The rise of the population of big cities; rapid urbanization and new legislative decisions for the protection of cultural heritage have each had impacts on the conservation field during 1960's extending to 2000's. The restoration processes of two symbolic buildings, chosen as case studies, Hagia Sophia Museum and Fatih Mosque, introduce the controversy between the decision making process and the restoration practice. In the article, the reasons behind these problematic restorations are highlighted and discussed. Finally, this essay classifies some of the issues related with cultural heritage in Turkey, in regard of decision making process and restoration practice and evaluates the main reasons behind these problems.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherEge Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSanat Tarihi Dergisi-Journal of Art Historyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural conservationen_US
dc.subjectmonumenten_US
dc.subjectIstanbulen_US
dc.subjectFatih Mosqueen_US
dc.subjectHagia Sophiaen_US
dc.titleCONSERVATION ISSUES OF MONUMENTAL BUILDINGS IN TURKEY IN PRACTICE, CASE STUDY: HAGIA SOPHIA MUSEUM AND FATIH MOSQUE IN ISTANBULen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.29135/std.507263
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage39en_US
dc.identifier.endpage65en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000595945400003
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.snmzKA_20250105


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster