Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi

Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi tarafından doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak yayınlanan; kitap, makale, tez, bildiri, rapor gibi tüm akademik kaynakları uluslararası standartlarda dijital ortamda depolar, Üniversitenin akademik performansını izlemeye aracılık eder, kaynakları uzun süreli saklar ve yayınların etkisini artırmak için telif haklarına uygun olarak Açık Erişime sunar.

MSGSÜ'de Ara
Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Huseyin Ozkal
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz Ozsoy, Cigdem
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T20:08:06Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T20:08:06Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0258-5316
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2018.2.8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14124/7994
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to improve the success and efficiency of the design concept evaluation and selection activity in industrial design by adapting two specialized evaluation-selection methods to the design process and comparatively demonstrating their use. The methods are called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Analytic Network Process (ANP). In their application, first the main design objective is decided upon and the evaluation criteria are determined accordingly, followed by the listing of the design concept alternatives. Then the criteria's importance values as well as relations between them are investigated and evaluation of the alternatives is done according to the criteria by using the tools provided by the methods. The application presented in the article evaluates seven hand cart designs by using the two methods. First the tasks that are common in both methods, then the tasks specific to each method are explained. The general criteria to be used in the evaluation are identified and the effects of these criteria on the evaluation process are determined through interviews with designers and users participating in the study. Then the relative performance rankings of the available seven hand cart alternatives are calculated by using both methods. Numerical results are listed in a descending order to show the success levels of the design concepts, pointing to the one that received the highest overall performance. The findings obtained from two methods are comparatively interpreted.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMiddle East Technical Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMetu Journal of The Faculty of Architectureen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalytical hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectanalytic network processen_US
dc.subjectdesign concept selectionen_US
dc.subjectproduct designen_US
dc.subjecthand cart designen_US
dc.titlePRODUCT DESIGN CONCEPT EVALUATION BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY AND ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESSESen_US
dc.title.alternativeAnali?ti?k hi?yerarşi? ve anali?ti?k ağ süreçleri? kullanilarak kavramsal ürün tasarimlarinin değerlendi?ri?lmesi?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authoridOzsoy, Ozkal Huseyin/0000-0001-5531-3539
dc.departmentMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4305/METU.JFA.2018.2.8
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage119en_US
dc.identifier.endpage146en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000454540000008
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85059933033
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.snmzKA_20250105


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster