Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi

Açık Bilim, Sanat Arşivi, Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi tarafından doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak yayınlanan; kitap, makale, tez, bildiri, rapor gibi tüm akademik kaynakları uluslararası standartlarda dijital ortamda depolar, Üniversitenin akademik performansını izlemeye aracılık eder, kaynakları uzun süreli saklar ve yayınların etkisini artırmak için telif haklarına uygun olarak Açık Erişime sunar.

MSGSÜ'de Ara
Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGulec Ozer, Derya
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Bulent Onur
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T20:08:07Z
dc.date.available2025-01-09T20:08:07Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1309-6915
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5505/MEGARON.2015.20592
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14124/8012
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents two case studies conducted in Architectural Design education in order to meet understanding and ability criteria in MIAK (Turkish Architectural Accrediting Board) and NAAB (National Architectural Accrediting Board) for 'sustainability'. The main purpose of this clause is to reinforce students' ability to design projects that optimize, conserve or reuse natural and built resources; their ability to provide healthy environments for occupants/users, and reduce the environmental impacts of building construction and operations on future generations through such means as carbon-neutral design, bioclimatic design, and energy efficiency. First-year undergraduate architecture students provided the setting for Case Study 1. A comparative study was implemented in a basic design studio between two distinct groups (a test group and a control group) mandated specifically with awareness raising. At semester's end, both groups' projects were reviewed and evaluated via questionnaire. Third-year undergraduate architecture students provided the setting for Case Study 2. An experimental study was carried out within the context of green design education, with the purpose of reinforcing understanding and ability of sustainability issues. The overall aim was to integrate building energy performance assessment into the design studio as a design decision support tool. As in Case Study 1, there were two groups. Students in the control group followed the conventional design process, while those in the test group tested the environmental performance of their proposals with computational models and energy simulations carried out with Ecotect v5.20. The conclusion reached was that a conventional design process is inadequate for a multidisciplinary knowledge-based studio aiming to integrate the theoretical basis of the energy-ecology field with architectural studio practice.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherYildiz Technical Univ, Fac Architectureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMegaronen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectUnderstanding and abilityen_US
dc.subjectarchitectural design educationen_US
dc.subjectecological awarenessen_US
dc.subjectMIAK and NAAB criteriaen_US
dc.subjectsustainability in design educationen_US
dc.titleEcological Architectural Design Education Practices Via Case Studiesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.authoridGulec Ozer, Derya/0000-0003-0288-8771
dc.departmentMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/MEGARON.2015.20592
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage113en_US
dc.identifier.endpage129en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000374756500001
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.snmzKA_20250105


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster